PocketBase vs Supabase
Detailed comparison between PocketBase and Supabase: Focus: PocketBase is a mobile-first database platform that provides an easy-to-use solution for building mobile apps, while Supabase is a Postgres database with built-in APIs for building scalable web applications. Deployment: PocketBase is designed to be deployed to the cloud, and it supports multiple cloud providers such as AWS, GCP, and DigitalOcean. Supabase can be self-hosted or deployed to the cloud, and it provides official support for deployment to AWS, GCP, and DigitalOcean. Development language: PocketBase uses a NoSQL data model and provides an SDK for building mobile apps with a range of programming languages, including JavaScript, TypeScript, Swift, and Kotlin. Supabase, on the other hand, is built on top of Postgres and uses SQL for data access and manipulation. Features: PocketBase provides a range of features for building mobile apps, including real-time data synchronization, user authentication, and data modeling. Supabase provides a Postgres database with built-in APIs for building scalable web applications, including real-time data synchronization, user authentication, and SQL queries. Community: Both PocketBase and Supabase have active development communities, but Supabase has a more established community with a larger number of contributors. In summary, PocketBase and Supabase are both open-source tools for building backend services, but they differ in their focus, deployment options, development language, features, and community. Choosing between the two depends on the specific needs of the project and the development team's preferences and expertise. If the project requires a mobile-first database platform for building mobile apps with real-time data synchronization, user authentication, and data modeling, PocketBase would be a good fit. On the other hand, if the project requires a scalable Postgres database with built-in APIs for building web applications, including real-time data synchronization, user authentication, and SQL queries, Supabase would be a better choice.