Amplication vs Supabase
Amplication and Supabase are both open source projects that aim to simplify the process of building web applications. Here are some key differences between the two: Focus: Amplication is primarily a low-code development platform that provides a visual interface for building database schemas, generating backend and frontend code, and deploying applications to the cloud. Supabase, on the other hand, is a backend-as-a-service (BaaS) platform that provides developers with a range of tools for building and deploying database-driven applications, including an open-source Postgres database, authentication and authorization tools, and a REST API generator. Development language: Amplication is developed using TypeScript, a statically-typed superset of JavaScript. Supabase is built on top of Postgres, a powerful relational database system, and its API is language-agnostic, meaning that developers can use any programming language or framework to interact with it. Deployment: Amplication is designed to be deployed to the cloud, and it supports multiple cloud providers, including AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Supabase can also be deployed to the cloud, but it is primarily designed to be self-hosted, which gives developers more control over their infrastructure. Community: Both Amplication and Supabase have active development communities. However, Supabase has a larger community and a more established ecosystem of third-party integrations and plugins. Features: Amplication provides a range of features for creating web applications, including support for GraphQL APIs, user authentication, and custom business logic. Supabase also provides these features, but it has additional features specifically focused on backend development, such as real-time subscriptions, custom triggers, and scheduled functions. In summary, while both Amplication and Supabase aim to simplify the process of building web applications, they differ in their focus, development language, deployment options, community, and features. Choosing between the two depends on the specific needs of the project and the development team's preferences and expertise.