LiveKit vs OpenVidu
Detailed comparison between the open source software named 'LiveKit' and the other open source project named 'OpenVidu': LiveKit and OpenVidu are both open source software for building video conferencing applications. They have similar goals, but there are some differences between the two. Architecture: LiveKit is designed as a self-hosted solution, whereas OpenVidu is a cloud-hosted solution that can also be self-hosted. LiveKit is built using Golang, and OpenVidu is built using Node.js. Installation and Deployment: LiveKit can be installed on-premises or in the cloud using Docker or Kubernetes, and it comes with a web interface for management. OpenVidu can be deployed as a Docker container or installed manually on a Linux server, and it also provides a web interface for management. Features: LiveKit provides features such as live streaming, recording, screen sharing, and chat. It also supports WebRTC and RTMP protocols. OpenVidu provides similar features, along with support for virtual backgrounds and browser-based video conferencing. Pricing: LiveKit is completely free and open source, while OpenVidu has a free plan for up to 100 concurrent users and paid plans for larger numbers of concurrent users. Community and Support: LiveKit has a smaller community than OpenVidu, but it has an active Discord server for support and discussion. OpenVidu has a larger community and provides documentation, tutorials, and support through its website and forums. In summary, both LiveKit and OpenVidu are excellent open source options for building video conferencing applications. LiveKit is self-hosted, free, and provides all the necessary features for video conferencing, whereas OpenVidu is cloud-hosted, has a larger community, and provides additional features like virtual backgrounds and browser-based conferencing. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs and preferences of the user.