Hanko vs Ory
Hanko and Ory are both open source projects that provide identity and access management solutions. Here is a detailed comparison between the two: Architecture and Technology Stack: Hanko provides a modern, lightweight architecture that is based on popular open-source tools such as NGINX, PostgreSQL, and Docker. It is designed to be cloud-native and highly scalable. On the other hand, Ory's architecture is based on microservices and uses Kubernetes as its orchestration platform. It also utilizes popular open-source tools such as NGINX and MongoDB for data storage. Functionality: Hanko and Ory both provide functionality for identity and access management, but their feature sets differ slightly. Hanko provides features such as multi-factor authentication, authorization, and identity management, while Ory focuses more on authentication and credential management. Ory provides features such as passwordless authentication, password recovery, and social login. Deployment: Hanko can be deployed on-premise or in the cloud, and it can be installed using Docker containers or Helm charts. Ory can also be deployed on-premise or in the cloud, and it can be installed using Docker containers or Kubernetes. Customization: Both Hanko and Ory are highly customizable, but they differ in the level of effort required to make changes. Hanko provides a REST API that allows developers to build custom integrations, and it also supports plugins for custom authentication workflows. Ory provides a comprehensive set of APIs and SDKs that allow developers to integrate its authentication and authorization functionality into their applications. Community and Support: Ory has a larger community than Hanko, and it is more mature as a project. Ory provides professional support and consulting services through its parent company, while Hanko provides professional support through its parent company and community support through its GitHub repository and a community forum. Overall, both Hanko and Ory are good open-source projects that provide identity and access management solutions. The choice between them will depend on the specific needs of the organization, as well as the deployment and customization requirements. If an organization needs more comprehensive authentication features, they might choose Ory, while if they need more robust authorization and identity management features, they might choose Hanko.