Hanko vs Keycloak
Hanko and Keycloak are both open source identity and access management solutions, but they differ in their architecture, features, and target audiences. Here is a detailed comparison of the two projects: Architecture: Hanko is a cloud-native solution built on a microservices architecture that can be easily scaled and customized. It is written in Java and can be integrated with other applications using REST APIs. Keycloak is also built on a microservices architecture, but it is written in Java and runs on top of the Wildfly application server. It can be deployed as a standalone server or as a set of Docker containers. Features: Hanko provides a range of authentication and authorization features, including user authentication, registration, and management, as well as OAuth, OpenID Connect (OIDC), and SAML support. It also supports passwordless authentication, two-factor authentication (2FA), and multifactor authentication (MFA). Additionally, Hanko offers advanced features such as device management and user analytics. Keycloak provides similar features, including user authentication, registration, and management, as well as support for OAuth, OIDC, and SAML. It also supports features like role-based access control (RBAC), custom policies, and fine-grained permissions. Keycloak also provides additional features such as integration with social login providers and support for identity brokering. Target audience: Hanko is targeted towards developers and organizations looking for a flexible, customizable, and scalable identity and access management solution that can be easily integrated with other applications and services. Keycloak is targeted towards enterprise organizations that require a comprehensive and feature-rich identity and access management solution. Keycloak is often used in large-scale deployments and has additional features like clustering and high availability support. Community support: Both Hanko and Keycloak are open source projects with active communities of contributors and users. Keycloak has a larger community compared to Hanko, which is a relatively new project. Keycloak also provides comprehensive documentation and support for its features and APIs, making it easier for developers to integrate authentication and authorization functionalities into their applications. Hanko, on the other hand, provides a range of resources, including documentation, guides, and tutorials, to help developers and organizations get started with the platform. In summary, while both Hanko and Keycloak are open source identity and access management solutions, they differ in their architecture, features, target audience, and community support. Hanko is built on a flexible microservices architecture and provides a range of authentication and authorization features for developers and organizations. Keycloak, on the other hand, is built on a microservices architecture and provides a comprehensive and feature-rich identity and access management solution for enterprise organizations.